Compare
RedundantDNS vs octoDNS
octoDNS, started at GitHub, is the reference for multi-provider DNS as code: the zone lives in YAML and octodns-sync applies it to Route 53, Cloudflare, Google Cloud DNS, Azure, NS1 and many more. It is free, well built and has about 3.7k GitHub stars and 30+ providers. RedundantDNS does the same core job (list, diff, apply per provider) as a product.
Side by side
| Aspect | octoDNS | RedundantDNS |
|---|---|---|
| Where the zone lives | YAML files in your repository | Canonical zone in RedundantDNS; edit it in the dashboard, API, Terraform or MCP |
| Who runs it | Your CI pipeline, your team | The RedundantDNS data plane (or yours, self-hosted) |
| Providers | 30+ via plugins | Route 53, OCI DNS, Google Cloud DNS, Azure DNS, Cloudflare |
| Drift | Visible on the next plan run | Verify after every change, plus alerts; adopt a provider-side change into the zone |
| Nameserver monitoring | Not included | Probes query every nameserver from each probe region |
| Alerts | Whatever your CI sends | Email, signed webhooks, Slack |
| Access for non-engineers | Pull requests | Dashboard with roles (owner, admin, editor, viewer) |
| Price | Free (open source); you pay in pipeline and team time | Free plan for one zone; paid plans from $29/month (draft) |
Facts about other products as of 2026-09-23. Tell us if something changed: we will fix it.
Which one to choose
Choose octoDNS when
Your team already reviews DNS changes as code, owns a CI pipeline for it and needs a provider RedundantDNS does not support yet.
Choose RedundantDNS when
You want two providers in sync without owning a pipeline, and you want probes, alerts and a dashboard people outside the platform team can use.
Importing an octoDNS or DNSControl configuration is on the roadmap, not available today.
Put your zone on two providers
Start with one zone and two providers you already have. Free, no card.